A Shorthand History of Penmanship
Record of the Month!
For the month of May, we are featuring a wide assortment of
records from 1812-1929 that showcases the variety of hands they were written in.
Throughout the 18th and 19th Centuries
students were taught penmanship (writing) by copying different writing styles
known as “hands” in a copybook, which contained the alphabet and several
phrases. Due to the cost of quills, paper, and ink, penmanship was reserved for
the wealthy upper classes (usually white males) and those whose professions
required it (clerks, merchants, businessmen, etc.).
While some elite upper-class women were formally taught to
write, penmanship was not considered an essential part of women’s education in
the United States during most of the 18th Century. However, many
literate women still managed to learn rudimentary writing and phonetic spelling.
From the late 18th Century into the 19th Century, more women
(though still widely upper-class women) were taught reading and penmanship due
to the clear need of these skills in managing a household and teaching young
sons, as well as the growth in popularity of the hobby of correspondence.
Different styles were taught based on class, gender, and
profession. Some of the more common styles used include the Flourishing
Alphabet, Italian Hand, German Text, Round Hand, Spencerian, and the Palmer
method. The Spencerian style of writing is named for Platt Rogers Spencer also
known as the Father of American Handwriting. Spencer’s style of writing became
the predominant style in the United States during the post-Civil War era into
the early 20th Century, due to his realization that to widely
disseminate his approach to writing, he needed to bring penmanship lessons to
normal schools (teacher training schools). Spencerian script influences can be
seen in many of the hand-writing samples from the 1860s through the 1900s displayed
here.
However in the latter 19th Century, a new writing
master challenged Spencerian dominance. Austin Norman Palmer disliked
Spencerian script; he claimed “that Spencerian handwriting was all wrong for
Americans” (Braden, 2017). Palmer had a number of complaints, including that Spencerian
was too slow, ornate, and feminine (Braden, 2017). While women and their style
of writing were expected to be feminine, femininity in general was considered a
negative trait denoting weakness. He felt that Americans (males) needed an
unsentimental, plain, and rapid style of writing that reflected the pace of
business. Palmer’s style simplified the more artful script of Spencerian, and
focused on teaching through repetition and the development of muscle memory.
The influence of Palmer’s style and method can be seen in the writing samples
from 1906 through 1929, especially when comparing the styles from the 1900 and
1906 samples.
Both a utilitarian skill and an art, penmanship and written language
have changed considerably through the centuries. Although beautiful when looked
at as a whole, legibility swiftly curbs many ardent researchers’ appreciation of
handwritten records.
To see all of the
sources used to write this article, please check out the Bibliography Page, or
to see full images of all of the writing samples from the Archives, check them
out in the Writing Samples Folder. If this information interests
you, please feel free to contact us by phone at 740-670-5121 or email archives@lcounty.com.